Kay LaurenceKay Laurence (Learning About Dogs) · 글
"being a clicker trainer"(클리커 트레이너가 된다는 것)라는 개념은 항상 논쟁과 오해를 불러일으킨다."fakery"(가짜, 기만)에 해당함."Clicker"(클리커) 자체는 단순한 도구일 뿐임.teaching(가르침)에 있어 명확성과 이해를 제공함."liking"(좋아요)과 실제 그 비즈니스나 가치를 좋아하는 것의 차이를 배워야 함.clicker나 Facebook 모두 단독으로는 의사소통 개선에 거의 아무런 효과가 없음.threads(쓰레드/대화 흐름)를 따르는 법을 배움.social reactivity(사회적 반응성)를 피함."quick response, icon based era"(즉각적인 반응과 아이콘 기반의 시대)에 의해 행동이 형성됨.clicker가 진화하기 전 확립된 기술들은 새로운 도구(클리커)를 통해 적응되고 연마됨.clicker-emergence period(클리커 출현기)는 우리가 무엇을 알고 무엇을 모르는지를 확대해서 보여주었음.clicker 자체가 훈련 프로토콜의 중심이 되어버림.clicker를 사용하지만, 사용 상황을 매우 구체적이고 선택적으로 결정함.clicker가 유용한 상황:exquisite timing(정교한 타이밍)과 relevant reinforcement(적절한 강화)를 기반으로 매우 정확하고 정밀한 결과를 가르쳐야 할 때."a move that is correct but stressed"(동작은 정확하지만 스트레스를 받은 상태) vs "a move that is correct and relaxed"(동작이 정확하고 이완된 상태).clicker를 사용할 때는 이러한 미묘한 차이를 알지 못했음.clicker의 영향력:low commitment(낮은 몰입도)를 나타냄.frenetic anxiety(광적인 불안)를 보임.clicker는 good teaching skills(훌륭한 가르침 기술) 위에 얹혀 있는 도구임.clicker는 그저 irrelevant noise(관련 없는 소음)가 됨.consistency(일관성)가 존재하지 않기 때문임."click for a loose leash/lead"(줄이 느슨해질 때 클릭하라)."salient information"(핵심적인 정보)도 전달되지 않음.click 소리를 무시하고 food delivery(음식 전달)의 타이밍에 반응할 수 있어야 함)clicker를 사용하는 시점: 내가 반복되기를 원하는 behaviour(행동)가 정확하게 반복될 것을 예측할 수 있을 때 사용함.clicker 사용 교육 시 operator(운용자)가 갖춰야 할 능력: behaviour가 원하는 방식으로, 그리고 그 개체의 미래에 이익이 되는 방식으로 발생할 확률이 매우 높도록 environment(환경)를 구성할 수 있어야 함.clicker 사용의 핵심 기술: set up(설정), anticipate(예측), 그리고 무엇을 click이 표시(mark)할 것인지 명확하게 verbalise(언어화)하는 능력.clicker는 non-effective(비효율적)하고 confusing(혼란스러운) 도구가 됨.teacher(교사)로서의 과제: 이러한 기술들을 가르치는 것이며, 이는 단 한 번의 lesson(레슨)으로 습득되는 경우가 드묾.reinforcers(강화제)의 사용, how they are delivered(전달 방법), what is delivered(무엇을 전달할지), where it is placed(어디에 배치할지), when it is delivered(언제 전달할지)에 대한 이해.positive reinforcement에 대한 이해가 clicker보다 훨씬 중요하며, 이것이 곧 clicker training은 아님.clicker를 사용할 때 얻을 가치가 없다고 판단되면 권장하지 않음.clicker의 목적: trainer(훈련사)의 만족감이 아닌, communication(의사소통)과 understanding(이해)의 개선.clicker의 역할: behaviour와 reinforcer 사이의 link(연결 고리) 또는 bridge(다리) 역할을 하여 둘을 분리함.clicker 이전 시대의 훈련 방식: 자체가 성공적인 결과를 표시(mark)하는 역할을 수행함.down position(엎드려 자세) 유도 사례: lured(유인), manipulated(조작), encouraged(격려)하여 자세를 취하게 한 후 그 자세에서 바로 급여함.treat(간식)을 꺼내거나 전달을 시작하는 movement of the hand(손의 움직임)를 marker로 인식함.dominant pattern of reinforcement(지배적인 강화 패턴): 약 85~90% 비율로 feeding out of location을 실천함.feed location 선정 기준: 학습자가 다음번 behaviour를 시작할 때 위치하기를 바라는 장소에 급여함.energy 유지 전략: location 설정 시 animation(활기)을 포함함 (간식을 잡기 위해 쫓아가게 하거나, 받아먹게 하는 방식).feeding in position(그 자리에서 급여)의 문제점: 학습자가 delivery process(급여 과정)가 시작되는 것만 쳐다보게 되므로, click이 의사소통에 어떤 이점을 주는지 알기 어려움.clicker의 유효성 조건: delivery가 시작되는 과정이 개의 눈에 보이지 않아야 함. 이때 audible marker(청각적 표시기)인 clicker나 verbal sounds(구두 소리)가 제 역할을 함.complete cycle(전체 순환 과정)에 대한 이해. (이것이 self-styled "clicker training"에서 자주 결여되는 부분임)clicker 사용 여부에 대한 논쟁은 무의미함.clicker든 word든 다음 조건이 충족되면 유효함:thoughtfulness(사려 깊은 사용)consistently followed by reinforcement(일관된 강화 수반)salient(두드러진/눈에 띄는 자극)clicker의 물리적 사용은 언어적 표현(verbalisation)보다 기술적으로 더 능숙하게 사용될 가능성이 높음.clicker를 누르는 행동은 "good"이나 "yes"와 같은 언어적 표현보다 더 많은 의식적인 학습을 필요로 함.new process)으로 발전시킬 수 있음.clicker는 우리가 무엇을 하고 있는지 의식하게 만듦.clicker는 우리가 집중하게 만듦.clicker는 우리가 질문하고, 기술(technology)을 배우며, 좋은 기술(good skills)을 개발하도록 유도해야 함.clicker는 훌륭한 의사소통(good communication)의 기회를 높임으로써 training(훈련)에 이점을 주는 도구임.processes)에 대한 올바른 이해 없이는 진정한 clicker training이 존재할 수 없음.tool)가 과정(process)을 정의하는 것은 아님.recognisable signposts)를 찾게 됨.survival instinct)임.obnoxious) 강아지 모습을 소개한 후, 그 강아지가 어떤 유쾌한 청년(Delightful Young Man)으로 변모해 가는지에 대해 서술.dogs)라는 최고의 학습자(premier learners)들과 삶을 공유하고 있다는 사실을 깨닫는 것은, 훗날 겪게 될 좌절감, 절망, 불안 및 끝없는 시간을 절약하는 길임.play)나 음식 급여(food delivery)를 하나의 활동(ACTIVITY)으로 바라볼 때, 우리는 개와 동일한 마음가짐(mindset)을 공유하게 됨.ethics)이 가이드가 되도록 함.Merlin이라는 개체가 저자가 내리는 모든 선택의 중심에 있음.coasting)를 하고 있는가, 아니면 개선(improving)하고 있는가?Leave it 프로토콜을 살펴보면, 이는 그저 "no"라고 말하는 또 다른 방식일 뿐임.what we do want)에 초점을 맞춰야 함.Reasons to use a clicker by Kay Laurence | Key Skills and Training The concept of “being a clicker trainer” is always going to lead to argument and misunderstanding because it cannot exist alongside the science and technology. It is a “fakery” of our time. No Clicker Trainers The clicker itself is a simple tool that when used in conjunction with technology provides clarity and understanding in teaching. Using Facebook does not make you social, it is the tool that gives you the opportunity to be social. You still need some skills and understanding of what being social is. We learn the difference between socially “liking” post or “like” a page or business, and actually liking the business or what they stand for. They may not mean the same thing to everyone. It may mean we support the author, the sentiment or the cute picture or are just responding to marketing. Neither a clicker or Facebook when used by themselves have little or no effect on improving communication. Many of us learned our virtual social skills in the early lists and email groups. We learned how to follow threads, avoided social reactivity and explain ourselves with excruciating detail making no presumptions about the knowledge of the readers. The new tool for virtual socialisation has adapted those skills, and the folk who missed the email shaped behaviours are shaped by this quick response, icon based era. I can see the similarity in dog training. Skills established pre-clicker evolution, were adapted and honed with the use of the new tool. The clicker-emergence period magnified what we knew and didn’t know. But for those who arrived later the skills are often absent and the clicker itself becomes central to the protocol. I use a clicker, but: When would a clicker be of benefit? I am very specific and selectively choose when a clicker would benefit a situation. It is a tool that can be used to teach very accurate, precise outcomes when based with exquisite timing and relevant reinforcement. It requires an understanding of what you want to teach and how it should be carried out. The difference between a move that is correct but stressed and a move that is correct and relaxed. I did not appreciate this when I first used a clicker. It has tremendous power, to build and equally to confuse. A confused learner will show a half-hearted interest in learning new things, often exhibit low commitment or at the other extreme demonstrate frenetic anxiety to be right. The clicker is a tool that rests on top of good teaching skills. If those skills or understanding are not present it becomes an irreleva
nt noise because consistency does not exist. The classic example is the advice to “click for a loose leash/lead”. The dog could be exhibiting 1001 different behaviours, a variety of which would be clicked giving the dog no salient information. The trainer could be lucky and get results, but not for the reasons they assumed. (Probably a dog able to ignore the clicks and respond to the timing of the food delivery). When to click? I use a clicker when I can anticipate the accurate repetition of the behaviour I would like repeated. When teaching the use of the clicker the operator should be able to arrange the environment so that the behaviour has a very high probability of occurring in a way that is desired and of benefit to the future of that individual. This is the skill that underlies the use of the clicker. Without being able to set up, anticipate and clearly verbalise what the click is going to mark it becomes a non-effective, and confusing tool. Our task as teachers is to teach these skills, which rarely arrive in a single lesson. We begin with the use of reinforcers, how they are delivered, what is delivered, where it is placed and when it is delivered. This is an understanding of positive reinforcement. This is more important than the clicker. This is not clicker training. If I do not consider a clicker is going to be of value to either the trainer or the dog then I would not advise its use. Its purpose is to improve communication and understanding, not to make the trainer feel good. Separate behaviour from the reinforcer It can separate the behaviour from the reinforcer by acting as a link, or bridge, between the two events. For those of us that learned our skills pre-clicker, there was a predominance of using the food delivery which marked the successful outcome. The dog was lured, manipulated, encouraged into a down position and fed in that position. The dog would have selected a movement of the hand, either to collect or begin delivery of the treat as relevant, or the marker. I still see dogs return to the feed location and demonstrate the desired behaviour because when in that position it was the moment the hand dipped into the pocket. Feed out of location My dominant pattern of reinforcement (in the range of 85-90%) is feeding out of location. I feed where I want the learner to be when they start the next repetition of the behaviour. If I want energy in the behaviour then there will be animation in the set-up of that location – a chase to collect the treat, a catch. If we are feeding in position then I do not see how a click benefits the commu
nication since the learner will simply watch for the start of the delivery process. If delivery begins where the dog cannot see the start of the delivery process then the audible marker, a clicker or verbal sounds, will do the job. It is the understanding of the complete cycle that is the critical skill. This is often absent in self-styled "clicker training". It makes us pay attention The endless arguments for using clickers or words will continue for many generations yet. It really does not matter. Either will be just as valid when used with thoughtfulness, consistently followed by reinforcement, and salient. What I do see is a verbal cascade of positive noises that are supposedly verbal-clicks that are NOT accurate, NOT consistently paired with reinforcement and have become non-salient to the dog. I do think that the physical use of a clicker is more likely to be used with skill than verbalisation. The behaviour of pressing the clicker takes more conscious learning than verbal “good” and “yes”. It can be developed as new process as if we were learning a new musical instrument rather than an adaptation of verbal sounds that have been with us for life. It makes us consciously aware of what we are doing. It makes us pay attention. It should make us ask questions, learn the technology and develop good skills. Using a clicker is a tool that benefits training by increasing the chance of good communication, but there never can be “clicker training” without a good understanding of the processes that support it. A tool does not define the process. Be-toothed Learning Machines The thing they don’t tell you is that raising a puppy is DANGED HARD WORK. Biting everything, peeing everywhere, eating anything; not for the faint hearted. Read More A Road to Nowhere When familiarity is stripped away we seek recognisable signposts that will take us back to comfort and security. This is survival instinct. It is worth listening to as it keeps us alive. Read More Surprising Puppy Surprising Puppy. With obnoxious moments. After introducing the obnoxious puppy as a youngster I am knocked over by the Delightful Young Man he is turning into…… Read More A New Puppy. Oh Joy. Impulse buying the wrong sofa can be rectified if you swallow the expense. Impulse buying a puppy can result in personal grief for you and your family and quite possibly result in a very unhappy future or end the life of that puppy. Read More Building A Generous Future Maybe it feels like a doddle because my life with her wasn’t one of competing against who she is, trying to mould her into something else, or
even just worrying about the potential fallout of every decision I made. Read More Don’t Let Them Learn Becoming aware that we share our lives with premier learners, dogs, is about saving you frustration, despair, anxiety and endless hours further down the road. Read More Play Health Check When we look at play or food delivery as an ACTIVITY we share the same mindset as the dog: is there pleasure to be experienced? Read More What is important … ? … when your dog is sick and fearful? If you have a dog who is sick and fearful you can feel lost and alone. The weight of opinion, expectation and information can be overwhelming. What is right? What is true? What is best? Throughout this journey I have allowed my ethics to guide me. The individual who is Merlin is at the heart of every choice I make. Read More Are you coasting? Are we coasting or are we improving? Is time so precious that we cannot invest in doing better? Looking at “Leave it” protocols, which are just another way of saying “no”. If we focus our training around what we don’t want the dog will focus on what to avoid. Focus on what we do want. Read More A Family of Multiple Dogs Another addition is not just an extra bed and bowl. It is important to build a home that is healthy, content and well-balanced. Read More In praise of naughty dogs .. a desire for solutions to problems that weren’t problems until someone else outside of the relationship suggested they were. Read More When it is not rewarding Just because it is our intent to reward does not make it always rewarding. Read More 2 Comments Michael Nichols on 13th March 2018 at 12:11 pm Excellent article. Crystallizes some rancom clicker concerns I have been wrestling with. Very helpful. One paragraph confuses me: “If delivery begins where the dog cannot see the start of the delivery process then the audible marker, a clicker or verbal sounds, will do the job. It is the understanding of the complete cycle that is the critical skill.” Can you clarify this for me a little? Thank you. Reply Kay Laurence on 14th March 2018 at 10:55 am Thanks for the feedback. The dogs are often using a visual marker to know when reinforcement will begin. Frequently this is the reaching for the treat – hand goes to pocket, treat pouch, or the head nods. This limits what the dog can learn by the need to continually make eye contact with the salient movement. I may want to teach my dog to do something where they need to be visually focussed on the job, not me or my movement to mark. This is where the audible marker has such value. Reply Submit a Comment Cancel reply
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked * Comment * Name * Email * Website Δ
food delivery