Kay LaurenceKay Laurence (Learning About Dogs) · 글
learning (학습)과 self development (자기 계발)에 전념함.mentoring (멘토링), 헌신이 존재하는 커뮤니티.business model (비즈니스 모델)에 더 집중하는 paint-by-numbers approach (색칠 공부하듯 단순화된 접근 방식).quick-fix (즉각적인 해결책), plaster-over-the-cracks (임시방편), market-a-product (제품 판매 중심) 방식.rebranding (리브랜딩)하는 것.scarcity (희소성)와 urgency (긴박함)를 조성함.graphic design (그래픽 디자인).old-same-old 방식.Everydog (모든 개 - Everyhuman만큼이나 허구적인 개념)을 대상으로 설계된 one-size-fits-all-approach (일률적인 접근 방식)에 맞춘 skeleton of a method (뼈대만 남은 방법론).dog training recipes (반려견 훈련 레시피)의 세계에서 높게 평가받음.GUARANTEED SUCCESS (성공 보장)를 그대로 따라 해도 달성하기 어려움.product (제품) 자체가 원래 아이디어의 원천이 가진 깊이를 결여하고 있기 때문.skills development (기술 개발), reward delivery (보상 전달), foundational actions or movements (기초 동작이나 움직임)의 복잡성.patter)는 혼란스러워하는 개로부터 시선을 돌리는 misdirection (주의 분산) 기법임.crash-test dummy (충돌 시험용 인형)처럼 이용될 뿐임.protocols (프로토콜)을 가르침.game of Telephone (전화 놀이 - 말 전달 게임)과 같음.mere shell (단순한 껍데기)임.thinking (사고), experience (경험), knowledge (지식)의 복잡한 그물망에서 완전히 분리됨.originator (창안자)로부터 멀어질수록 roots (뿌리)를 잃고 점점 더 약해짐.trace their origins (기원을 추적)하는 것이 중요함.trajectory (궤적)를 이해하기 위함.body of work (전체 작업 체계) 속에서 어떻게 기능했는가?appropriation (무단 도용)은 단순한 lack of intellectual integrity (지적 정직성 결여)의 표시를 넘어선 문제임.protocols (프로토콜) 자체, 그리고 그것을 통해 도움을 받아야 할 사람들에게 큰 해를 끼치는 행위임.dog training (반려견 훈련)을 복잡한 이해 과정이 아닌, 단순히 틀에 박힌 template-style recipes (템플릿 방식의 조리법)에 불과하다는 인식을 강화함.dog training은 본질적으로 canine learning (개들의 학습)과 dog-human interactions (개와 사람의 상호작용)에 대한 복잡한 이해를 바탕으로 함.Pound Shop Protocols (출처 없는 저가형 프로토콜): 출처 없이 떠도는 훈련법을 의미함.Biting everything).peeing everywhere).eating anything).Delight (강아지가 주는 기쁨)는 보통 몇 주, 운이 좋으면 4주 정도 지속됨.Delight는 은혜를 모르고 불쾌한(obnoxious) 행동을 보이기 시작함.Surprising Puppy (놀라운 강아지): 불쾌한 시기를 지나면서도 놀라운 모습을 보여줌.obnoxious puppy를 거쳐, 점차 멋진 Delightful Young Man (사랑스러운 젊은 개)으로 변해가는 과정에 감동할 수 있음.A carefully planned learning pathway (주의 깊게 설계된 학습 경로)를 따라야 함.The Cost of Cherrypicking by Frances McCormack | Seeing with New Eyes Credit Where Credit’s Due Two Sides of the Dog Business The dog business is full of people who appreciate and admire dogs, who want a better life for them and the humans among whom they live. These people are dedicated to bringing out the best in all parties, and are committed to continuous learning and self development. This is a community of sharing, encouragement, mutual support and help, generous mentoring, and dedication. But there’s also a shallower side to the industry: a paint-by-numbers approach to dogs that’s more focussed on the business model than on facilitating genuine and lasting change; a quick-fix, plaster-over-the-cracks, market-a-product approach that, although far less common, is quite insidious. And one of its most well-used tools is the rebranding of the work of others. Harvesting Scarcity and urgency are the mode of marketing; chummy language that makes you feel like you’re a friend; sparkling graphic design in attractive fonts and coordinated colours. But the product is the same-old-same-old: someone else’s thinking and work stripped down and reduced to the barest elements. This skeleton of a method fits better with the one-size-fits-all-approach designed for Everydog (as much of a work of fiction as Everyhuman) that is so prized in the land of “dog training recipes.” Even if followed with great care, the GUARANTEED SUCCESS that the sales pitch offers will be difficult to achieve because the “product” lacks the depth of the source from which it was appropriated. Complexity of skills development, reward delivery, and foundational actions or movements are bypassed, so that the hapless customer can watch a trainer proclaiming to get the dog from A to B in a flash in a video neatly edited with all the slickness of a washing powder advert, the patter to camera a misdirection away from the confused dog who’s being used as a crash-test dummy for quick fixes. And the clients of these harvesters, if they enter the business themselves, teach these watered down, stripped back, hollowed out protocols in turn, transforming the original ideas into the punchline in a game of Telephone, where, with each whispered utterance the idea becomes more distorted, less recognisable. The Shell What often remains is a mere shell of its former self, so detached from the origins it had in a complex web of thinking, experience, and knowledge of the originator. The further that a method is removed from said originator, the more divested it is of those roots, and the weaker it becomes. Sometim
es this can be a good thing: as ideas are transmitted, they can be improved, altered, adapted to meet new demands. But even in this case, it is important that we trace their origins so that we can understand their trajectory – where did this idea arise?; where did it lead?; how did it fit into a larger body of work? This appropriation without credit isn’t just a display of a lack of intellectual integrity – although it certainly is such – but it does a great disservice to the ideas or protocols, and to those they are intended to serve. Why Bother? It’s in the origin of ideas that their rationale lies: the experience, knowledge, and values that underpin them; the ways in which they are integrated with oeuvre that can, perhaps, provide deeper insight and further rationale for their existence. To take any idea out of the context from which it emerges is to erase this complex origin; to oversimplify, reduce, and dilute; and to further entrench the idea that dog training is a matter of mere template-style recipes rather than a complex understanding of canine learning and dog-human interactions. Giving Credit Keeps Us Accountable There’s a humility in deferring to the expertise of others, and a congruence that increases trust in us. When we admit that the ideas we’re sharing are derived from the work of others, we demonstrate our own commitment to learning, we give our clients the tools to explore deeper and learn more (which is bound to further strengthen their relationship with and commitment to their dogs), and we position ourselves within a network of expertise where we acknowledge the importance of the methods we transmit and the weight of the experience, research, and knowledge behind them. Pound Shop Protocols are those that circulate without attribution: throw this spaghetti at the wall and see if it sticks; there’s another one where that came from. If we care enough about our methods, though, then we ought to be honest about where we learned them and, of course, about the fact that there may be gaps in our own understanding: “I’m not sure; I’ll have to go back and re-read/re-watch/send an email.” Creativity Breeds Creativity On a more human level, though, rebranding someone’s ideas whether to profit from them or not is taking advantage of their generosity in sharing their work, and will stifle that creativity. If we, as a collective, passively accept that the dog business is a place where any one person’s ideas exist to be scooped up, resold or redistributed, without credit or due care, then people will be reluctant to share their ideas publicly, whic
h will impede and inhibit sharing, will erode trust, and will ultimately disadvantage the dogs for whose benefit most of us entered this world in the first place. An industry acknowledges and honours the complexity of the work in which it is involved needs to treat its own methods with the care that they deserve, and giving credit where credit is due is a good first step. Be-toothed Learning Machines The thing they don’t tell you is that raising a puppy is DANGED HARD WORK. Biting everything, peeing everywhere, eating anything; not for the faint hearted. Read More Building A Generous Future Maybe it feels like a doddle because my life with her wasn’t one of competing against who she is, trying to mould her into something else, or even just worrying about the potential fallout of every decision I made. Read More Obnoxious Puppy The delight of your new puppy is probably going to last a few weeks, maybe four if you are lucky. When 12 weeks old hits, and you will feel a slam, the Delight is going to demonstrate ungrateful, obnoxious traits. Read More Surprising Puppy Surprising Puppy. With obnoxious moments. After introducing the obnoxious puppy as a youngster I am knocked over by the Delightful Young Man he is turning into…… Read More It’s Not Training A carefully planned learning pathway, paced to suit that particular learner for their life ahead. Read More The Experienced Dog Knowing your dog has receive sufficient preparation does not mean every eventuality, but a range of different conditions so that when the unexpected happens they will draw on their skills and solve the issue. Read More Teaching People: more than rewards and reinforcers Familiarisation with the behaviourists’ models of reinforcement, punishment, shaping, extinction, can prevent us from looking outside the windows for either dogs or people … Read More When we train a dog it grows Most training starts from necessity. Management is a necessity but it usually benefits all parties by a reduction of conflict. Are they expanding their skills to benefit us or for their benefit? Read More Living well through movement “The purpose of learning is to get more or better rewards” W. Shultz Can we assume that the more we learn the more rewards we can enjoy? Often these... Read More Dogs are Born To Learn We can build tremendous learners when we get beyond the idea that “dogs are trained”. Read More One dog watching The other dog working or ….how to train the spectators to quietly rest and watch whilst you work, play, teach a single member of the group Read More Fast does not mean better We are becom
ing surrounded by a culture of fast. We are being sold that immediate gratification is the only solution. Read More Submit a Comment Cancel reply Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked * Comment * Name * Email * Website Δ