Kay LaurenceKay Laurence (Learning About Dogs) · 글
green:blink는 결코 이벤트이거나 반려견이 피하고 싶어 하는 것이어서는 안 됨.training은 aversions(혐오 자극)가 아닌 attractions(끌림/유인)을 사용하여 진행함.fade-in과 fade-out 운용 방식training assistant(훈련 보조자)가 있는 경우: fade-in 방법과 fade-out 시점을 완전히 숙지해야 함.training하는 경우:fixed green:blink(고정된 녹색 깜빡임/신호)를 사용함.cycle(주기)을 반복하며 dog가 green:blink에 노출되는 정도를 스스로 조절할 수 있음.dog가 의자 옆에서 자신의 cycles를 수행할 때까지 진행함.fade-in application(점진적 도입 적용)을 시작할 때는 base behaviour(기초 행동)부터 시작함.refreshing(복습/환기)을 통해 더 큰 효과를 볼 수 있음.cycle과 training loop의 구성base behaviour: dog가 선택을 내릴 수 없을 때 기본적으로 취하게 되는 행동.red light(빨간 불)와 같은 역할임.cycle의 구성: Antecedent(선행 사건), Behaviour(행동) [Mark], Consequence(결과).[Mark]는 선택 사항임.dog가 준비되었는지, cue(신호)를 찾고 있는지 확인.cue(A)를 제공.dog가 그에 응답(B).mark를 수행.reinforcement delivery process(강화 전달 과정, C) 시작.dog가 간식을 먹는 동안 다시 다음 cue를 찾게 됨.green:blink의 단계적 적용min green:blink 1: mark와 reward(보상) 사이.med green:blink 2: 약간 더 강도가 높고 가까움.max green:blink 3: 가깝고 더 긴 시간 동안 적용.Green:blink 4: “A”와 “B” 사이.Green:blink 5: cycle 전체에 걸쳐 퍼짐.Connect and Share는 비스킷 소리와 유사함.Setters에게만 공개됨.Community Setters: 열정, 경험, 지식, 그리고 반려견을 가진 사람들.Get In Touch를 통해 직접 연락할 것.fade-in 활용 사례 (Kay Laurence)fade-in 사용 예시를 환영함. 때로는 그림/예시가 작동 방식을 가장 잘 설명해 주기 때문임. 적용 방법과 장소에 대해 다양하게 생각할수록 적용 기술이 창의적으로 변함)fade-in 적용 (2018.07.31)training bowl(훈련용 그릇)을 훈련받지 않은 강아지가 닿을 수 없는 높은 곳에 보관함.leave it(기다려/참아)을 가르친 것이 아님.expectation(기대)과 understanding(이해)이 faded in(점진적으로 도입)된 것임.green light가 training loop의 다른 부분으로 어떻게 이동할 수 있는지 궁금함.green light가 항상 켜져 있어야 하는가?dog와의 근접도를 조절하여 강도를 조정할 수는 있지만, 루프의 다른 부분으로 이동하는 것은 어려운 과제임.base behaviour는 “저녁 식사를 기다리는 것”이고, fade-in은 “식기 그릇이 바닥으로 내려오는 과정”인 것인가에 대한 확인 질문)“wait there”(거기서 기다려)라는 cue(신호)를 준 뒤에 food bowls(밥그릇)를 바닥에 내려놓습니다.food bowls를 바닥에 내려놓는 타이밍:during the behaviour(행동을 수행하는 도중)에 내려놓습니다.fade-in(서서히 도입)하려는 대상 자체가 동시에 그 행동의 cue(신호)가 되기 때문에, 이 타이밍을 잡아내기가 까다롭습니다.Jo Cook의 질문: 과거 Kay Laurence가 Expo(엑스포)에서 진행했던 세션과 연결해 질문함.Kay Laurence는 distractions라는 단어가 개와 환경의 관계를 설명하기에 적절하지 않은 표현이라고 언급함.Jo Cook의 해석: "She said dogs were not distracted but merely determining the relevance of environmental stimuli, especially unfamiliar stimuli." — (개들이 산만한 것이 아니라, 환경적 자극, 특히 낯선 자극의 관련성을 판단하고 있을 뿐이라는 지적을 언급하며 이것이 정확한 연결인지 확인 요청)Kay Laurence의 답변: traditional training(전통적 훈련)에서 사용하던 용어를 그대로 가져오는 것은 seeing with new eyes(새로운 시각으로 바라보기)로 전환하는 것을 훨씬 어렵게 만듦.distraction에 대한 정의와 반려견의 관점:distract(주의를 산만하게 하다)한다고 해서 그것을 우리가 '방해 요소'라고 규정할 권한은 없음.distraction 여부는 오직 개만이 결정할 수 있음.distraction은 개에게 life threatening(생명을 위협하는) 상황일 수 있으므로, 개는 당연히 그 대상을 확인하고 잠재적 위험과 보상을 판단해야 함.fade-in을 통한 학습 단계fade-in(서서히 도입)의 목적:shaping(셰이핑)과 마찬가지로, 잠재적인 사건들을 매우 작은 단위로 제시하여 개가 자신의 반응이 타당한지 아닌지를 학습할 수 있도록 함.small slices(작은 단위)로 제시할 때의 이점:recovery(회복)가 훨씬 쉬워짐.check it out(확인하기)을 마친 뒤 일상으로 돌아오기 수월함.fade-in의 실행 방식:fade into view(서서히 나타남)하게 한 뒤, 다시 fades out(서서히 사라지게)함.If there is a Setter pic here, then this is a Setters only page Fade In Protocol Application first published June 2018
n, it should not be simply recorded as “error”. Before we begin the practical work we should prepare a range of events to fade-in. These are our green:blinks - the increasing brightness, wavelength and duration of the light in the Terrace experiment. They should be of short duration: a blink, of low intensity: quite far away, and have very little impact or relevance to the dog. Green:blinks should never be an event or something the dog wishes to avoid. We train with attractions, not aversions. If you have a training assistant they need to be fully aware of how to fade-in and when to fade-out. If you are training alone, use a fixed green:blink and as you progress through the repeats of the cycle you can control the exposure of the dog to the green:blink. You could use a pot of food on a chair outside the doorway. At first it is not on view, then on view for a moment, then increasingly in full view, then closer in proximity until the dog is rolling through their cycles alongside the chair. To begin the fade-in application we begin with the base behaviour. If it has been taught previously then it would benefit from refreshing. This is the behaviour the dog will default to when unable to make a choice. It is the red light in the Terrace experiment. We choose this behaviour in the cycle of Antecedent, Behaviour [Mark], Consequence. [Mark] is optional. We look to see if the dog is ready and seeking a cue, we give the cue (A), the dog responds with (B), we mark this to promise good things and begin the reinforcement delivery process (C). As the dog consumes their treat they will be seeking another cue. More ..? min green:blink
Schie on 31st July 2018 at 2:42 am When puppies, the training bowl was kept high and out of untrained puppy reach. Over time, as they learned that the food from it was dished out by me, it was gradually lowered until now I can have it right in front of their noses and they do not eat from it. It was never snatched away nor were they told “no” or taught leave it, the expectation and understanding that the food in the bowl came from me was faded in. I am very interested in how the green light can move around the other cycles of the training loop. If training alone my options are limited. The green light may need to be on all the time? I can adjust its intensity by changing my dog’s proximity but moving to the different parts of the loop seems to be a challenge. Does anyone have any ideas or suggestions? Reply Kay Laurence on 7th August 2018 at 11:15 am So the base behaviour is “waiting for dinner” and the fade-in is the food bowl going to the floor? To move it around the cycle, the food bowls would go to the floor after you have cued them to “wait there”, or sit up at the table if it is the family! Then the food bowls would go to the floor as they are taking up position (during the behaviour) This is a tricky one to up pick, as the item you are going to fade-in, is also its own cue? Reply Jo Cook on 8th December 2020 at 8:14 pm Once again my head is exploding. I understand this intellectually, but need to read and reread and perhaps try to come up with examples in order to consider applying this. I am connecting this to a session Kay did at Expo years ago where she discussed the word distractions and thought it was an unfortunate choice of words in regards to dogs and the environment. She said dogs were not distracted but merely determining the relevance of environmental stimuli, especially unfamiliar stimuli. Is that a on point connection, Kay? Reply Kay Laurence on 9th December 2020 at 7:06 am Carrying forward terminology from traditional training often makes the change to “seeing with new eyes” much harder. If an event “distracts” it is not up to us to decide it is a distraction …. only the dog can do that. “Distraction” could be life threatening, so of course the dog needs to check it out, then make a decision on the potential threat and rewards available. Not us. Fading in allows us to present potential events in very small slices, as with shaping, to allow the dog to learn whether a response is valid or not. Those “small slices” mean recovery from check it out is much easier. It “fade into view”, and then fades out again ….. Reply Submit a Comment Ca
ncel reply Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked * Comment * Name * Email * Website Submit Comment Δ Main Project Page Setters Home